Menu
Posted by4 years ago
Archived
Covered by Medicare (because cata-racts tend to occur with aging), which makes a one-time payment to the facility and to the physician for doing a cataract procedure. Everything that is part of the description of a cataract procedure is included in the bundled payment, i.e, an innovative device for creating a capsulotomy would be part of the. Both Medicare and Ohio Medicaid to provide benefits of both programs to enrollees. Providers in your area, visit CareSource.com/MyCare or call Member Services. Professional Group. Crowe, Colin E, MDbB. Miller, Michael J, MDb.
![Colin Miller My Medicare Pro Colin Miller My Medicare Pro](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125695956/236094102.jpg)
Yesterday, Colin Miller, /u/EvidenceProf, Professor of Law and one of the hosts of the Adnan Syed Legal Trust-sponsored Undisclosed podcast, wrote an unusual piece of fan-fiction on his blog.
In the post, he wrote how he would question potential alibi witness Asia McClain if he were the sort of lawyer who ever appeared in court and how Asia should then testify if Asia were the sort of 'witness' who ever obeyed court orders and subpoenas. Already, we're firmly in cuckoo bananas territory.
Shortly thereafter, he removed the post entirely. Thankfully, our very own /u/ofimmsl preserved it here: http://imgur.com/a/WOFAN
Today, /u/EvidenceProf took to Twitter to explain why the post was removed.
I took it down due to abusive comments by certain commenters about Asia. Didn't want a sounding board for that
As other Redditors have noted, comments on The Evidence Prof's blog are moderated and require his approval prior to appearing on the site--no abusive comments directed toward Asia could have appeared on the blog without his authorization. Therefore, it seems that he is being dishonest about his reasons for deleting the post.
Perhaps he'd care to explain himself better here.
(HT: /u/Sarahhope71 for her honesty in pointing out that comments on Colin Miller's blog are moderated.)
354 comments
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.Abstract
![Colin miller my medicare provider Colin miller my medicare provider](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125695956/479848934.jpeg)
The clinical activities that constitute longevity making in the United States are perhaps the quintessential example of a dynamic modern temporality, characterized by the quest for risk reduction, the powerful progress narratives of science and medicine, and the personal responsibility of calculating the worth of more time in relation to medical options and age. This article explores how medicine materializes and problematizes time through a discussion of ethicality—in this case, the form of governance in which scientific evidence, Medicare policy and clinical knowledge and practice organize first, what becomes ``thinkable' as the best medicine, and second, how that kind of understanding shapes a telos of living. Using liver disease and liver transplantation in the United States as my example, I explore the influence of Medicare coverage decisions on treatments, clinical standards, and ethical necessity. Reflexive longevity—a relentless future-thinking about life itself—is one feature of this ethicality.